Critical
Thinking
The exercises and content is well written and researched, with numerous
examples to illustrate the concepts being covered. An abstract
of the program is duplicated below with the permission of the author,
as well as the Table of Contents of the lessons
included in the program and information about the author.
This program is written and distributed by Duldt and Associates, bduldt@rma.edu.
Inquiries about the program, Demo copies and licensing information can
be directed to Jerry Raskin of A.S.K Data Systems, St. Louis, MO : niksar@aol.com
(Tell him you found it here!)
It is designed to be incorporated into courses
and/or classes about theory analysis, research, and clinical or administrative
practice. It is not designed to stand alone. However, it may
be appropriate for individual students in academic difficulty, but it would
probably need some degree of faculty oversight to assure students'
mastery of the content. The program is
designed to be a user friendly so that even those having minimal computer
exposure can learn to use the programs easily and comfortably. It is highly
advisable to complete the first three lessons before moving to the others.
The content of these initial lessons provides necessary information
and perspectives for understanding later lessons. There is a higher
probability of mastering the critical thinking skills if one moves sequently
through the
lessons.
The goal to is to facilitate the development
of critical thinking and analysis of information in several ways.
First, one checks the credibility of the authority or source, and makes
a personal decision about the value and appropriateness of any issue or
topic. Second, one defines terms used to insure clarity of conceptual
definitions of phenomenons. Next, it is a
simple skill to recognize words and check the appropriate option of
a test question. It requires a bit more skill to talk intelligently
about something. Ultimately, it takes considerable ability and thought
to become informed on
a topic, approach it from multiple cognitive directions (pro, con,
or neutral), and be able to argue, through either speaking or writing,
from favorable as well as opposing points of view. The scholar of
any discipline is readily recognized for the skills of critical thinking
and succinct communication.
There are eight lessons in this computer assisted instruction
program: these are outlined as follows:
. 1 Critical Thinking: Being Creative
Defining
Concepts
Twelve ways to define
Principles
Students'
Survival Tips
Questions
. 2 Critical Thinking: Logic and Reasoning - Part A
Organizing
your thoughts. Some Definitions.
Development
of an Argument/Claim - Evidence
Principles
Student's
Survival Tips
Questions
. 3 Critical Thinking: Logic and Reasoning - Part B
Development
of an Argument, cont.
Warrant
Reservations
Qualifiers
Principles;
Student's Survival Tips
Questions;
Summary of Logic and Reasoning, A & B.
. 4 Critical Thinking: Being Persuasive
Developing
a Paper, Examination or Speech
Using
the Key-hole Approach:
Style I - Defining and Describing Concepts
Style II - The Position Paper on an Issue
Examples, Good and Bad (use
Student Tutor Handbook)
Practice
Outlines, Style I, II.
Developing
Critical Thinking Techniques.
Fallacies - Errors in Reasoning
An Argument Formula by Toulman
.5 Analysis of Audience: The Speech Occasion
Psychological
Laws
Attitudes
of Audiences (Teachers, Friends,
Colleagues,
and Others)
Hostile
Neutral
Positive
Mixed or Unknown
.6 The Writing Process: Time: Start Planning Early
Conceptualizing
Organizing
Drafting
Resting
Pilot
Testing (having someone read, listen to it)
Submitting
.7 Just Can't Get Started?!!
How to Capture Ideas
Clustering
Center
of Gravity
Brainstorming
Notes
and Recordings
.8 For More Information...
References
Writers'
Conferences
Journals
for Writers
An Argument Formula by Toulman
About the Author's Thinking
Among her recent publications, Dr. Duldt has
defined scholarship. She
defines critical thinking as follows:
Critical thinking is as old as Socrates and continues to be an essential component of scholarship. It is the key characteristic of the educated person. One becomes scholarly by systematically developing habits of thinking. Critical thinking is characterized by careful analysis and judgment. According to Boyer, there are three elements which comprise critical thinking: discovery, integration, and application; and I would add a fourth, influence.
Discovery refers to the identification of new knowledge, a unique
approach, or a different paradigm. This means perceiving the subject
in a new perspective, noting the gaps in the literature, seeing more questions
rather than only answers to questions,
and many more things like these.
Integration refers to those thought processes which interpret, draw together, and bring new insight to bear on original knowledge and research. This means developing a new paradigm, reorganizing structures, and fashioning a new idea.
Application refers to those ideas, old or new, which are considered
as potential solutions of current problems of significance and consequence.
So, problem solving is really only one element of the critical thinking,
yet it seems to be discussed more
readily in nursing than the other three elements.
Influence refers to the ability to persuade others through a well-developed
sequence of reasoning and logic. The success of such leadership attempts
tends to depend on one's ability to communicate in a creditable manner.
One needs to be skillful
in developing arguments and in communicating in a trustworthy, gentle,
persuasive manner. The desired outcome is to initiate change and
have an impact on people and events.
. . .To possess critical thinking skills is the difference between
being nobody special to being somebody who can make a difference.
Copyright
© 1998
Permission to reproduce these resource pages is granted for
non-profit educational use provided the above information
is retained on all copies.
Inquiries to: michael.connelly@mcckc.edu
Last modified: 03/02/04